Does @modelcontextprotocol/server-sequential-thinking send data, and where? — data-flow verdict

100/100 integrity 100% evidence coverage evidence-backed Measures evidence support, not confidence — how this is scored

Verdict (the facts)

Tool
npm/@modelcontextprotocol/server-sequential-thinking
Integrity axis
honest — Observed behaviour matches its description; no undisclosed recipient.
Data-flow axis
No network egress to external destinations was observed — the tool ran purely locally.
Disclosure
n/a — No external egress was observed; there is nothing to disclose.
Capture self-test
verified
Severity
none — integrity axis (no undeclared exfiltration; no egress at all).
Version (pinned)
2025.12.18 · commit 2d18c2308dfb2c751bc31498edfbefe103849b7c
Content hash
sha256:867e26d5ed69179f18e2dd220f8c41c8e58d8978398cc200fda036f97bcfa836
Signature
ed25519:byHH0EERxDhzXDH++Kh7QfjzpdffxVF5RgI6vG… · Ed25519 public key · sha256:49cf8457b42a7048
Scanned
2026-06-13T00:00:00Z — Pinned to @modelcontextprotocol/server-sequential-thinking@2025.12.18 (git 2d18c2308dfb2c751bc31498edfbefe103849b7c), published 2025-12-18. This verdict applies to that exact version; a newer release would require a re-scan.
Re-verified
2026-06-14 — pinned version current
Categories
ai-ml no-egress published
Observation history
1 scan(s); first seen 2026-06-13T00:00:00Z · latest 2026-06-13T00:00:00Z

Observed egress destinations

hostcountryjurisdictionclassdisclosurefrequencykind

Jurisdiction context:

Disclosure check (the §824 evidence)

Read
Quoted from the tool's own docs
“”
Match
No external egress was observed; there is nothing to disclose.
Residual gap

How we know this — claims by basis

Observed — directly in the capture, reproducible

Classified — our adversarially-reviewed judgment

Method

Installed and run in an isolated container; fed traceable decoy data; all outbound traffic intercepted (TLS broken via own CA, iptables transparent redirect). A beacon self-test confirmed the capture was live.

Scope

Compares the tool's declared destinations against what was observed in one sandbox run. Checks transparency / integrity for a cooperative tool, NOT resistance to deliberate evasion. "honest"/"clean" means "observed without deviation within our reach", NOT "guaranteed no hidden egress". Out of scope: exfiltration split/chunked across requests; tool-side encryption of the payload before egress; input/time/state-triggered processing not triggered in the run.


Machine-readable verdict: /verdict/sequentialthinking.json. This page describes observed behaviour and its relation to the tool's own disclosures — it is not a legal judgment. Search context: does @modelcontextprotocol/server-sequential-thinking send data, @modelcontextprotocol/server-sequential-thinking privacy, @modelcontextprotocol/server-sequential-thinking data flow, @modelcontextprotocol/server-sequential-thinking telemetry, where does @modelcontextprotocol/server-sequential-thinking send data, is @modelcontextprotocol/server-sequential-thinking safe, what data does @modelcontextprotocol/server-sequential-thinking collect, how to disable @modelcontextprotocol/server-sequential-thinking telemetry, @modelcontextprotocol/server-sequential-thinking opt out tracking, @modelcontextprotocol/server-sequential-thinking GDPR data residency, @modelcontextprotocol/server-sequential-thinking third-party / jurisdiction.