Definition

Unsupported Claims

An unsupported claim is an assertion in an audit that has no independently verifiable evidence behind it — the audit says it, but nothing observed confirms it.

How it's measured

Canary flags any claim that survives only on the model's say-so: no captured traffic, no matching documentation, no reproducible check. When a claim we would make cannot be evidenced, we hold the verdict rather than publish it.

Examples

‘SOC2 certified’ with no certificate retrieved; ‘no telemetry’ with no capture self-test; ‘review completed’ with no artifact. Each is unsupported until evidenced.

FAQ

What does Canary do with an unsupported claim?
It is marked unsupported and excluded from the evidence-backed verdict; if the whole finding rests on it, the verdict is held for human review rather than published.
Can an audit be confident and still full of unsupported claims?
Yes — that is the most common failure. Confidence is not evidence.

Related: Integrity Score · Evidence Coverage · Unsupported Claims · Methodology · Benchmarks